Friday, 16 September 2016

Book Review of "Puppet on a Chain"

Not everything that glitters is gold would be another evocative title for this spell-binding book by Alistair Maclean. Maclean takes us through the streets of Amsterdam where appearances are deceptive and conceal as much as reveals a sordid reality which is of violence and drug abuse where seemingly respectable characters are anything but ideal.
While its perspective on Amsterdam may be a bit dated as it was published as far back as 1969, nevertheless crime and drug abuse remain pressing concerns even from a contemporary perspective.
The plot is pretty direct centering as it does on an Interpol narcotics specialist, Paul Sherman, who arrives on some kind of a mission to Amsterdam. What that mission exactly is never becomes quite clear though some action packed sequences later he does unravel some criminals engaged in the drug trade. We suspect his friend James Duclos who is most inconveniently killed at the outset is somehow integral to whatever that mission might have been as he had information to divulge to Sherman which again most inconveniently he couldn't as he was done away with before being able to do so.
We do however gain a perspective on some characters such as the Reverend Goodbody or the cop Van Gelder who while seemingly respectable are in fact criminals. The 'hero' Sherman if we can call him that is quite a jaded character and quite as ungainly as the Second World War tank he is named after. He however does have the virtue that he is able to cheat death time and time again. His accomplices such as Maggie who is pitch forked to her death are however not as lucky. Having said that I couldn't quite see the point of having two women associates accompany Sherman on what is quite obviously a dangerous mission, even if it isn't always clear what exactly that mission is supposed to be. There are also some seemingly pointless deaths on the way apart from Maggie's and I couldn't understand what exactly was the point in so many people expiring though one is told quite conveniently on the way that it was due to Sherman's "inefficiency."
Nor is it very clear what exactly Sherman's relations are with his two women accomplices also obviously Interpol employees as it quite obviously isn't one of equals and nor is it one even of 'first among equals.' There is a hint of the romantic which fits ill with the unfolding of quite a sinister chain of events though perhaps not unexpected considering that we are quite obviously concerned with drugs and crime in a seemingly modern Western city. Indeed what is remarkable of 'Puppet on a Chain' is of course that it isn't region specific and could quite as obviously be transcribed to any other modern cosmopolitan setting where drugs and crime are involved.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9464774

Friday, 9 September 2016

The Children of Men: Book & Film Review

The Children of Men is a dystopian novel written by British author P. D. James that was published in 1992. The 2006 film Children of Men by Alfonso Cuaron is based on the book.
In both the book and the film the action is set in England, a few decades in the future, where worldwide sterility has been strucking for a quarter of a century. In this dying Great Britain, we follow Theo Faron, drawn into a small group of dissidents trying to protect a woman who has inexplicably become pregnant and whose child is likely to be used for the tyrannic government's own agenda.
And that is basically all the similarities between P.D James' book and Alfonso Cuaron's film. Saying the film is an adaptation of the book would be wrong; Cuaron inspired himself from P.D James' universe, borrowing settings and character names but that is all.
While the first half the film sets us into a realistic very actual disintegrating society with video screens everywhere, terror attacks and a government department called Homeland Security, the second half completely overlook this dystopian theme and become a reflective action movie.
In the book, the theme of the broken down society is omnipresent and we are often reminded about the grotesque desperation through scenes of women pushing dolls in pushchairsor people organising christening ceremonies for newborn pets. Science is seen as the fallen God who has failed to explain and cure the mass infertility and religion is either a consolation or an emptiness for people. The elderly and infirms have become a burden and are pushed to accomplish the Quietus, a mass suicide ceremony. Youngsters from poorer countries are lured into England only to be treated as slaves and sent back to their country when they become too old to work.
P.D James' book is, more than everything else, a pertinent analysis of politics and powers and offers an interesting view on how some tyrants come to power, in particular through the character of Xan Lyppiat, the Warden of England and Theo's cousin. Exceptionally self-confident, he easily seized the title of Warden in an apathetic society where people have lost all interest in politics and happily gave away full power to one man. Xan is no less than a despot, having reduced the Parliament to a merely consultative role and his five people Council never disagrees with him. His rule is advertised and approved by the mass as the fitting answer to the country's threats. It condones the forced labour of immigrants and encourages mass suicides of the old. "What we guarantee is freedom from fear, freedom from want, freedom from boredom. The other freedoms are pointless without freedom from fear."
About Xan's personal motives, when asked by Theo, he answers, "At first because I thought I'd enjoy it,[... ] I could never bear to watch someone doing badly what I knew I could do well." And when he finally grew fed up with power, he claimed that no one in the Council was capable enough to replace him.
Going back to the group who hope to oust Xan, Theo warned them, "If you did succeed, what an intoxication of power". The warning hangs about the whole novel and it is a theme the film could have explore deeper. Xan is called Nigel and is a secondary character, appearing in a single scene. He is not the Warden of England but a government minister which limit the whole 'seduction of power' theme.
If Theo is the most faithfully adapted character from the books, he still was toned down in the film. He is less ambiguous and more sympathetic, a former activist who lost his son to an epidemic flu. In the book, he is an Oxford history teacher who accidentally killed his daughter towards whom he felt more jealousy than love.
The ends are also drastically different. Cuaron chose an optimistic ending, where Theo saved the mother and child from the claws of anyone wanting to use them, putting her under the protection of "Human Project", a scientific group dedicated to curing infertility. The film ends on a black screen with the sounds of children playing.
The ending of the book is astutely ambiguous, with Theo putting on the Coronation ring, symbol of the Warden's power, apparently succumbing to the 'seduction of power' he warned against.
As P.D James said, "The detective novel affirms our belief in a rational universe because, at the end, the mystery is solved. In The Children of Men, there is no such comforting resolution."
In my opinion, both book and film are great and I think they complement each other pretty well. My favourite moment in the film is the Bexhill detention camp which allows us to see first hand the abuses the refugees endure and that were only mentioned in the books (Isle of Wight). This part is so accurate it is impossible not to draw a parallel with today's world. However, P.D James goes even deeper into that whole decaying hopeless civilization and reading the Children of Men is an eye-opening and maybe also a warning to what our society is turning into.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9508849

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

Making Money Online In The Conspiracy Theory Niche

Conspiracy theories have been in existence since the beginning of time. Whenever a phenomenon that people don't believe and (or) understand occurs, humans will reconcile these events with facts from which they can form a frame of reference. Whether the resulting theories are accurate or not is known by very few but what is undisputed, is society's fascination with conspiracy theories. As internet marketers, the next logical step from this realisation would be us actually making money from the conspiracy theory niche.
Machiavelli, Nostrodamus and countless other sages and visionaries have achieved acclaim through their ability, or lack thereof, to predict the future. A knowledge of future events provides human beings with a sense of security, one of the most basic needs as Maslow indicated. Any time an internet marketer can satisfy a need, there will be plenty of money to be made. So the question remains, how does one go about making money online in the conspiracy theory niche? The answer is a very simple one, provide relevant information about the subject, market it to the public, deliver the information to the public and maintain contact with your market.
Let us now see how we could apply the above mentioned strategy in practice. I highly doubt that many of the people who read this article are able to predict the future, are members of secret societies or have had paranormal experiences. Fortunately for the astute internet marketer, there are people who claim to possess these qualities or to have experienced these events. Some of these people have gone as far as creating information products that we can help to promote and profit from as a result. These authors can be found on the ClickBank website, which I'm sure you're very familiar with by now. After selecting a product that impresses you and doesn't have too many competing affiliates, your next task would be to market the digital product successfully. There are plenty of ways to market digital products but by far the quickest way to get people to visit your affiliate link would be to make use off PPC (Pay Per Click) advertising. I personally recommend that you create a website in the particular niche you are appealing to, then point your pay per click visitors to it. Having your own website allows you many advantages too numerous to mention in full in this article. The biggest advantage of having your own website, it must be mentioned, is the ability to capture email addresses of your visitors through the use of an autoresponder. Once these tools are in place, the most important element of your marketing efforts has to be completed by you.
I write this with the belief that you have an interest in conspiracy theories. This interest will be the foundation of all the traffic your website will receive because we will convert it into valuable content for your visitors. Contrary to popular belief, content is still king when it comes to internet marketing. Whenever you are in the possession of a website with relevant, interesting and unique content, you may rest assured that your site will be indexed quickly by the search engines but more importantly, you will immediately be able to add value to your potential customers. The more value you add, the more inclined a potential customer will be to purchase through your affiliate link link.
Making money from the conspiracy theory niche is not frighteningly difficult. With sound business fundamentals, internet marketing know how and a genuine interest in the field, an aspirant internet marketer will find it quite easy to be making money from the conspiracy theory niche.
This article was written by Million Dollar Blueprint, a successful internet marketing firm. Did you find these tips on how to make more money on the internet useful? You can find out a lot more about using the internet as your million dollar blueprint by going to http://milliondollarblueprintblog.blogspot.com/ where you can also get instructions to download Napoleon Hill's, Laws of Success in 16 lessons for FREE!


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6857128

Friday, 17 October 2014

The Mother of All Conspiracy Theories

Fifty years ago in Dallas, Texas, late in the afternoon of Friday, November 22, 1963, Mrs. Marguerite Oswald of Fort Worth was hauled into the Dallas police station, along with Marina Oswald, Lee Harvey Oswald's Russian-speaking wife, and Ruth Paine, the woman with whom Marina and her two children resided in Irving, some ten miles west. Mrs. Oswald's son had been arrested for two capital crimes that day. A lesser known victim, Officer J.D. Tippit, shot by handgun shortly after 1:10 p.m. would not create as many ripples throughout history as the name of his first victim at 12:30. Of course, we're talking about President John F. Kennedy. The police wanted to know the facts about a certain Mannlicher-Carcano 6.5mm rifle with a four-power scope, which the FBI were determining had been bought through the mail by Alex J. Hidell. Oswald had been arrested with membership cards signed by A.J. Hidell. He also rented a post office box using this identity and had received delivery of the rifle and a.38 revolver back in April, 1963.
Mrs. Oswald wasn't a universally liked person. In fact, her son Lee hadn't even informed her of the birth of his second child at the end of October. He wasn't on great terms with anybody, but his mother was not close to any of her three sons. There is much written about their poor relationship starting from his infancy until the time he left the very ruffled nest at seventeen to join the Marines. A lot is made of the fact that he slept in his mother's bed until he was eleven years old. More grist for the psychologist's mill are the incidents where, as an infant, he was forced to stay locked in his bedroom without toys as a form of discipline. But during questioning by Dallas police about the century's greatest crime committed by a single individual, Marguerite Oswald came to his defense.
She said to Dallas police that she wanted to speak to the FBI. Soon in the company of two men who both identified themselves as Agent Brown, she said she had something of great importance to tell them and proceeded to explain, "... I feel like my son is an agent of the government, and, for the security of my country, I don't want this to get out." She insisted before continuing that she would speak only with agents from Washington. After a bit of wrangling about the geographical purity of their origins she continued, "I want this kept perfectly quiet until you investigate. I happen to know the State department furnished the money for my son to return back to the United States... so please will you investigate this and keep this quiet." Oswald, an avowed Marxist, had defected to Russia, but after a mere few years had begged the U.S. State department to lend him the money to return. All this notwithstanding the fact that he had slashed his wrists so that he could stay in Russia and later entered the US embassy loudly shouting that he wanted to renounce his US citizenship but a few short years before. Clearly, one could argue that mental problems ran in the Oswald family.
Thus began the Mother of All Conspiracies. Little did Mrs. Oswald realize her words would become the seed for thousands of conspiracy theorists the world over, germinating like persistent weeds among the fertile imaginations of ill-informed couch analysts. She'd be in good company: Jessie James' mother had claimed a government conspiracy was responsible for her two sons' murderous behavior almost a century before and the mother of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, of Boston Marathon infamy fifty years later, would claim a similar government plot in spite of incontrovertible evidence to the contrary.
In the Kennedy assassination, the first conspiracy theory to gain public favor was the "Magic Bullet". People reading only the text of the Warren Report postulated that a single bullet traversed Kennedy's back, exited the throat, made a zig-zag to the right in mid-air, gaining in height as well, and entered Governor Connolly's right back, broke five inches of rib, exited, turned right then left, entered his right wrist, broke bones, exited his wrist, turned left again and punctured his thigh, only to fall in pristine condition onto a stretcher at Parkland Memorial hospital. Of course, without saying it directly but using a mocking tone, they wished to imply the Warren Report's conclusion was poppycock. Half a century later, by reconstructing the motorcade and examining the seating arrangements in the limousine, a laser beam proved that this one bullet could have done exactly what was proposed by the official investigators. The Zapruder film shows Governor Connolly twisting his body to the right, lifting his cowboy hat with his right hand at the same time that Kennedy's arms reached for his throat in abject pain. Further examination of the limousine shows that the back bench was higher than the fold-down jump-seat by three inches, itself also offset toward the center of the car by three to four inches, which lines up the subjects with regard to downward trajectory. All this says that the originator of this theory didn't have access to, or know the layout of the seats in the limo, didn't analyze meticulously, if at all, the Zapruder film, didn't attempt to accurately reconstruct the scene - but essentially formulated a conspiracy of unnamed individuals involving the US government, without ever getting off the reading couch.
The next theory to gain wide acceptance, 'Six Seconds in Dallas', postulates that six seconds isn't enough time for an amateur to have fired three bolt-chambered shots. It incorrectly assumes that the first shot was fired less than two seconds before the one that entered the President's neck. How could one lone sniper take aim, fire and reload with a bolt-action rifle in six seconds? It postulates that it's not possible, that another gunman had, on the grassy knoll, fired along with Oswald, the implication being that a conspiracy was required to commit the assassination. Again, we are misguided by investigation techniques that never set foot outside the reading lounge. Examination of the Zapruder film shows that filming of the motorcade down Elm Street began after the limousine had already traveled several yards. Zapruder was saving film because of the cost and short amount of film in cameras back in the day, so it can be determined with reasonable certainty that he only turned on his camera after the first shot had been fired. An investigator in 2011 found archival footage of an FBI crime recreation film shot from Oswald's window days after the event. He discovered that the traffic lantern had a hole in it. Six floors lower than Oswald's position as the motorcade passed almost directly below, this would have been the most difficult shot because the rifle required the most motion to follow the target while he had to look through a four-power scope at something only 70 feet away, where it is known that his vision was obscured first by a large tree and subsequently, a traffic lantern hanging from a pole. This meticulous investigation shows that Oswald most likely hit the traffic lantern with his first shot which deflected, hit the pavement, and burst into fragments injuring a bystander in the cheek. The conspiracy theory goes up in smoke when we discover through better investigation techniques that Oswald had almost eleven seconds to fire three shots, not six seconds.
The Mother of All Conspiracy Theories was perpetrated by Jim Garrison, District Attorney in Louisiana, who contended that since David Ferrie (fired for 'immoral behavior' with boys) had briefly belonged to the same Civil Air Patrol unit as Oswald in 1954, that since David Ferrie can be proven through witness testimony to have spoken about assassination to two unknown, shady Mexicans or people of such racial lineage and one 'Leon', that since David Ferrie also knew one Clayton Shaw, a suspected homosexual and influential local businessman who had offices in the International Trade Mart, the very building in front of which one Lee Harvey Oswald passed out pro-Castro leaflets, that they did conspire to commit the assassination of John F. Kennedy, President of the United States of America. The case, for reasons which would be obvious to first year law students and avid Perry Mason fans, soon fell apart, but this did not stop Oliver Stone from making a sensational movie about it which seems to have captured the imagination of the conspiracy buying public. It's equivalent to making a case in the following manner: that since mafia men A and B knew low-level peon C who may have met Jack Ruby, who probably killed Oswald to shut him up... etc, etc. After listening to this one, your head is spinning, trying desperately to understand all the conjecture, tenuous associations, and murky motivations.
And lastly the United States government itself is guilty of falling prey to conspiracy mania, a disease of the mind first spawned that fateful day in 1963 by Mrs. Marguerite Oswald. The HSCA in 1979, a House committee to investigate assassinations, concluded that there was a 'high probability' that a conspiracy had been responsible for the death of President Kennedy. They based this conclusion solely on the evidence of a taped police motorcycle radio transmission which purports to convey the sound of four shots in Dealey Plaza. Unfortunately, after their determination, a researcher listening to the tape heard faint crosstalk in the background of other police transmissions that only occurred more than a minute after the assassination, a fact which is verifiable and supported by the National Academy of Sciences. In spite of this admission, the HSCA committee did not withdraw its conclusion. By the way, anyone with a microphone clipped to the chest knows that you really shouldn't emphasize your words when speaking by thumping your chest with your hand, because it will have technicians in the studio ripping off their headsets in pain. The point being that sound can be misrepresented. The sad truth is that many people want to believe in conspiracies. One lone, maladjusted loser with a thirty-five dollar mail-order rifle and cheap scope couldn't have successfully assassinated the President of the US without help from powerful, connected and sinister co-conspirators, it just defies credulity.
The truth about all conspiracy theories is - they're just that, unproven theories, calculated misrepresentations of the facts to garner public support usually in order to sell books or make movies, some of the proponents simply wishing to hawk memorabilia to tourists on the grassy knoll behind the book depository for a couple bucks profit, shouting "We know the bullet that killed Kennedy came from right here, right where we're standing". Conjecture and association aren't proof nor evidence, it's the worst form of justice, rumor mongering of the worst kind which would only be known as 'evidence' in countries with secret police and extra-judicial punishments, never meeting burden of proof, never meeting accusers, only finger-pointing and innuendo. Rather than justice, they do a great injustice to craft a story for the purpose of sewing doubt about the fidelity of democratic institutions. It breeds mistrust towards the state and is the ultimate in cynical, unproven indictment, insinuating a nefarious nature to the activities of state apparatus. Conspiracies theorists weave incalculable harm to democracies, fragile abstractions of the mind at the top of our evolutionary thinking susceptible to such malicious and unverifiable charges. Think twice before allowing theorists to gain your support. If you're a member of government, be very careful before manipulating any truth for your own purposes, you'll be sewing the seeds for public mistrust which will soon come back in the form of a conspiracy theory. Jay Leno, popular American talk show host, once joked that a survey found 55% of Americans believed aliens had landed, whereas only 35% believed whatever their government tells them. Marguerite Oswald would be proud of her accomplishment.
Ed Schofield is a writer from Nova Scotia, Canada. His e-books can be found at Amazon.com.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/7776324

Friday, 5 September 2014

Some conspiracy theories just won't stop, I know I often create them for fun out of the blue? Not sure why I like to create conspiracy theories, maybe it's more fun that writing Sci Fi? Who knows, but recently I created one about the cruise ship off the coast of San Diego which had an engine knocked out. First they said it was a fire, then they said it wasn't, now they say it is. Ah ha, everything we need for suspicion, curiosity, and a full-blown - give it to me baby - conspiracy theory - oh yah!
Turns out someone read my cruise ship conspiracy theory where I said the engines were knocked out with an electromagnetic pulse weapon! Guess what someone read that article and has been investigating all this. My reader tells me "We have some good friends who were on that ship. When the engine room "caught fire", it wasn't just a fire...it was an explosion felt all over the ship. Despite the crew coming over the intercom repeatedly saying there was no fire, the ship was engulfed in smoke with all hands running to the engine bay with fire extinguishers."
Oh this good yes! But it gets even better as my reader notes that "the most interesting part is...no one had cell phone reception after the "fire" happened...for the entire duration of the trip. The cell phones worked just prior to the fire, but not after. I'm not sure if this is due to an EMP, or, more than likely, the ship had cell phone jamming equipment on board, which is more and more common these days."
Can you see how the conspiracy plot thickens? Who done it? Was it the Russians, Chinese, or maybe a North Korean submarine? Was it underwater space aliens? I mean this stuff is cool right? So, now I am thinking, hey, I really did create one heck of a conspiracy theory, just like the pros, experts, and counter intelligence agencies spread them? WOW, holy smokes, that is VERY interesting. But what if the conspiracy is real? Okay drum roll now and fade to late night mystery radio theatre background tunes, or better yet the Art Bell - George Noory "Somewhere Out There" theme song. Get down, this is cool stuff. So, could it be real? Maybe?
Of course, the ships relay system, on-ship cell phone + satellite relay might have been taken out if the ship lost power, and those.5 watt cell phones only go a little distance and they were pretty far out to sea, so, that might be part of the cell phone question. Although you'd think the ships cell tower and communication system would be on back-up generator power, so it would seem that it would still work. Or everyone tried to call and it immediately jammed up the cell system which couldn't take the increased traffic with everyone getting on at once.
Still, this brings up a very interesting point of contention, makes me speculate further and ask even more questions now. Anyway, the entire event sure sounded fishy, and there seems to be MUCH more to the story, something is up! But then my reader drops the bomb, I mean really throws in a "what if" - almost making the conspiracy seem real! My reader said; "Some other info they shared, but I didn't think as much of it as they - was that an aircraft carrier arrived at the ship almost immediately and Navy Personnel boarded the cruise ship. Our friends thought much more of this, but this was reported in the media and it appears this was to assist, not for protection."
Turns out that my reader's friends also said that the electricity was out for the duration of the trip, not even back-up power for lighting? Even the satellite phones were not working, but all this points to an electromagnet pulse? Okay another drum roll please, and this time let's play the Twilight Zone theme song and keep this conspiracy theory alive - "don't ya just love it, chicka boom, chicka boom!" Okay it gets better, you see the cruise line company claims it was just a simple fire in the engine room, but my reader asks would that send a massive shockwave through the ship, which kills all the power too? Next, my reader asks the dubious question; "I understand the ship not wanting to start panic at the time by not telling the truth, but there's no reason not to come clean now." And "I find it one heck of a coincidence that this ship was disabled within a day of a missile being launched from the ocean in the same general area (within 200 miles of each other). In both instances, the extent of what actually happened has been withheld, for reasons good or bad."
My reader is speaking to the question of the missile launch off the coast of Los Angeles, also unexplained, and that for sure was not ball-lightning! So, let's consider these additional points of contention. Yes, cruise ships have several back-ups systems for crucial parts of the ship. Medical Facilities, lights, bridge power, communication, etc. A nuclear aircraft carrier, what? 35-36 knots max, not sure, but to go 150 nautical miles 4 + hours. Yes, why was an aircraft carrier nearby? Good question!
The second point is also one I considered as well. I do not believe in coincidence either! I understand there have been some unexplained things which have happened out there some 163 miles South West before, a couple of years back - grape vine stuff. And there have been some interesting "events" discussed in the past off the coast of Catalina too. Someone has a secret out there, and they aren't telling anyone, which is exactly how to get conspiracy theories rocking and rollin' - so please consider all this.
Lance Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the Online Think Tank. Lance Winslow believes it's hard work to write 22,000 articles; http://www.bloggingcontent.net/


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/5509968